下手すると欠陥ワクチン４４００回分を他国にばらまいた医療テロ国家だゾ☆

2023年11月7日火曜日

そもそもブランケット・イミュニティー適応対象の医薬品なんてもんを接種する行為は自らマルタ志願するようなもんだゾ☆

https://jyado.blogspot.com/2023/11/blog-post_91.html

💉The triumph of the AstraZeneca vaccine undercut by tragedy https://t.co/u3XYRZnUBr

— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) November 8, 2023

The triumph of the AstraZeneca vaccine undercut by tragedy
https://www.telegraph.co.uk › news › 2023/11/08 › th...
1 day ago — The vaccine is no longer used in the UK, quietly shelved some time ago, while a glance at AstraZeneca's latest financial accounts show that in ...

AstraZeneca Taken to Court Over “Defective” Covid Jab in Landmark Legal Case
BY WILL JONES
8 NOVEMBER 2023 6:00 PM

The Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine has been branded “defective” in a multi-million pound landmark legal action that will suggest claims over its efficacy were “vastly overstated”. The Telegraph has the story.


The pharmaceutical giant is being sued in the High Court in a test case by Jamie Scott, a father-of-two who suffered a significant permanent brain injury that has left him unable to work as a result of a blood clot after receiving the jab in April 2021. A second claim is being brought by the widower and two young children of 35-year-old Alpa Tailor, who died after having the jab made by AstraZeneca, the U.K.-based pharmaceutical giant.

The test cases could pave the way for as many as 80 damages claims worth an estimated £80 million over a new condition known as Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT) that was identified by specialists in the wake of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine rollout. …

The vaccine, which was heralded at its launch by Boris Johnson as a “triumph for British science“, is no longer used in the U.K. The Government recommends three other vaccines for its autumn booster programme.

In the months following the rollout, the serious side-effect of the AstraZeneca jab was identified by scientists. Following this, it was recommend it no longer be given to the under-40s in the U.K. because the risk of receiving the jab outweighed the serious harm posed by Covid.

AstraZeneca last night told the Telegraph that patient safety was its “highest priority”, that its vaccine, called Vaxzevria, had “continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile”, and that regulators around the world “consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side-effects”.

It is understood AstraZeneca, in its legal response, denies causing Mr. Scott’s injuries.

Official figures from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) show at least 81 deaths in the U.K. are suspected to have been linked to the adverse reaction that caused clotting in people who also had low blood platelets. In total, almost one in five people who suffered from the condition died as a result, according to the MHRA’s own figures. …

As many as 80 claimants could lodge legal cases with the High Court by the end of the year in a class action that threatens to undermine faith in the rollout of the AstraZeneca vaccine that was developed jointly with Oxford University.

In Mr. Scott’s claim, his lawyers argue that he suffered “personal injuries and consequential losses arising out of his sustaining Vaccine Induced Immune Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia (VITT) as a result of his vaccination on April 23rd 2021, with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination”, which the legal claim alleges was “defective”. They also argue that no warning of the risk of VITT was included in the product information on the date of supply of the vaccine.

AstraZeneca issued press releases following clinical trials saying the vaccine – known as Vaxzevria – was between 62% and 90% effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 depending on dosages, with an average of 70%. The legal claim states: “In fact, the absolute risk reduction concerning COVID-19 prevention was only 1.2%.”

An absolute risk reduction measures how much the vaccine reduces an individual’s baseline risk of getting ill from Covid at a particular time. If Covid levels are low, the absolute risk reduction rate will be much lower too.

This is different from a relative risk reduction, which compares the numbers of vaccinated people getting ill with those getting ill who did not receive the jab.

Worth reading in full.

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/11/08/astrazeneca-taken-to-court-over-defective-covid-jab-in-landmark-legal-case/

問題は…

mhlw.go.jp/stf/newpage_28291.html#:~:text=厚生労働省は、令和,のとおりお知らせします。

コレはマズいのでは？

、、、（爆ｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗｗ